•   ABOUT
  •   CONTACT
  •   LOG-IN/REGISTER

Railtalent

  • HOMEPAGE
  • NEWS
    • 2021-2023 Train Rail Hackathon
    • Sustainable Development Goals
  • SDGs
  • CAREER PATHWAYS
    • Infrastructure
    • Vehicles
    • Operations
    • Signalling
    • Economics
    • Administration
    • Academia
    • Career Profiles
  • MEMBERS
    • Research
    • Education & Training
    • Enterprises
    • Associations & Networks
    • Individuals
    • Education Providers Directory
  • PARTICIPATE
    • Events
    • Courses
I AM/SEARCH RAILTALENT
Thursday, 05 April 2018 / Published in General News

Cost only factor in cancellation of British electrification projects

A report released on March 29 by Britain’s National Audit Office has concluded that the Department for Transport’s (DfT) cancellation of three major electrification projects in July 2017 was motivated solely by cost, countering secretary of state for transport, Mr Chris Grayling’s, claims at the time that bi-mode trains could offer similar benefits to passengers.
The report says that cost increases in infrastructure manager Network Rail’s (NR) 2014-2019 five-year funding period meant electrification of the Midland Main Line (MML) between Kettering, Nottingham, and Sheffield, the Great Western Main Line (GWML) between Cardiff and Swansea, and the Windermere – Oxenholme branch in the Lake District were no longer affordable.
NR’s reclassification as a public body in 2014 hindered its capability to borrow funds to make up the shortfall. With a £2.5bn budget hole and plans to raise £1.8bn through asset sales unachievable, the DfT, NR and the treasury decided they needed to cancel projects.
The DfT estimated that cancelling the three electrification projects would save £105m in 2014-2019 investment period and avert £1.385bn of spending in the subsequent 2019-2024 funding period.
Grayling and chancellor of the exchequer Mr Phillip Hammond agreed to the Midland Main Line and Windermere – Oxenholme cancellations in March 2017, but prime minister Mrs Theresa May requested an updated business case for the Cardiff – Swansea project. This was delivered in July 2017 and found that the benefit:cost ratio of the scheme had fallen from 0.6:1 to 0.3:1, prompting May to agree to the cancellation, and Grayling to make the announcement that all three projects had been scrapped.
The report says that it is too early to tell the extent to which the DfT will be able to deliver the benefits of electrification without electrifying the three routes. While the plan to introduce bi-mode trains to run on the non-electrified sections would offer greater flexibility, the report says there are some disadvantages such as increased track damage and higher energy costs.
It also says that despite Grayling’s claims that bi-mode trains could offer a journey time of one-minute less than electric sets between London and Sheffield, no bi-mode trains are currently available to meet this level of performance, although it is expected that they will be by 2022.
  • Tweet

What you can read next

First Alstom Prima for Indian Railways on test
Network Rail commissions cloud-based digital archive
Learn more about Australasian Railway Assocation courses

Contribute

  • Login

Recent Posts

  • European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions

    Last July, the European Commission adopted a pa...
  • New tools and insights to optimise infra-capacity, deal with disturbances and improve train services

    Apply the skills and knowledge needed to deal w...
  • UIC World Congress on Rail Training, Talent and Development (WCRT) 2022

    The UIC is pleased to inform you that the ...
  • Post Master’s Degree in Smart Mobility: Digital Transformation of Mobility Systems – executive

    Drive tomorrow’s mobility Digital technol...
  • TRA Visions 2022 Young Researcher Competition Invitation

    TRA VISIONS project is organising a compet...

Categories

  • General
  • General News
  • Featured
  • Profile
  • Strategic
  • Jobpost
  • Tactical
  • Operational
  • Infrastructure
  • Signalling
  • Vehicles
  • Operations
  • Economics
  • Administration
  • Academia
  • Gender equity
  • Sustainable mobility

Archives

  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • January 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017

Get in Touch With Us.

Join the community of Rail Talents

CONTACT US NOW

Rail Talents is the platform for:

  • Exchanging experiences, knowledge, success stories and management practices with international peers;
  • Publishing and reading of  articles, videos, blogs, presentations;
  • Developing competencies and expertise;
  • Engaging with a wide range stakeholders: railway professionals, industry partners, universities, etc.

MEMBERS

  • Research
  • Education & Training
  • Enterprises
  • Associations & Networks
  • Individuals

PATHWAYS

  • Infrastructure
  • Vehicles
  • Signalling
  • Economics
  • Operations
  • Administration
  • Academia
  • Profiles

PARTICIPATE

  • Events
  • Courses

COPYRIGHT 2018 RAILWAY TALENTS

What are you looking for?

I am a future Rail Talent

Students, apprentices, professionals outside of the rail sector

CLICK FOR MORE INFO

I am Rail Talent

Rail professionals,, consultants, trainers, researchers, experts.

CLICK FOR MORE INFO

I am looking for Rail Talent

Employers, project managers, employment agencies, job boards.

CLICK FOR MORE INFO
TOP